Where appearance has been requested or invited by Before the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. 17 through 50, WebThe following is the tentative ruling for a case calendared before Commissioner Jared D. Beeson in Department 19 located at the Turlock Division at 300 Starr Avenue, Turlock, CHAI V. NATIONAL ENTERPRISE SYSTEMS, INC. GUZIK TECHNICAL ENTERPRISES V. KEYSIGHT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. RONALD PATRICK V. FERRARI OF NORTH AMERICA, ET AL. Plaintiff has demonstrated entitlement to the requested relief, which is mandatory based on counsels declaration. will be able to access it on trellis. Accessing the tentative rulings at the public kiosks located, in Self-Help Services, Room 101 of the Gordon D. Schaber Courthouse or Room 212 of the Hall of Justice Building. 12 KORBIN WILSON and MATTHEW BURNHAM, as individuals, on behalf of 13 themselves and all others similarly situated and TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION the State of California as a private attorney FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF 14 general, CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT 15 Plaintiffs, V. ARASH PADIDAR, ET AL. Petitioner still lives in the property but the mortgage has gone unpaid and there are no liquid assets to pay it. Parties who do not call to contest the ruling before 4:00 pm on the court day before the hearing or appear without notice to the Court and opposing counsel will not be heard. Thus petitioner knew or should have known that she would have to make an election within four months after the decedents death. Websanta clara county superior court tentative rulings. Websanta clara county superior court tentative rulings. The court will not be able to provide copies of the rulings once they have been replaced on the website. Drop boxes: Any document deposited in the court drop box between 8:00 AM and 5:00 PM will be deemed filed on that same day. WebIn this section Pre-grants, Continuances, Drops, & Tentative Rulings Property Transfers Financial & Medical Decision Making Probate Help for Children Probate Rules & Forms Introduction to Probate Court Probate cases can be complicated. 15 SANJAY JAYAWARDENA, et al., Petition, page 2, paragraphs 2 & 3. Any argument is limited to five minutes. February 27, 2023 new bill passed in nj for inmates 2022 No Comments . Pursuant to the restrictions in Code of Civil Procedure 1161.2, no tentative rulings are posted for unlawful detainer cases and appearances are required. MARIIA KRAVCHUK VS TAYLOR MORRISON OF CALIFORNIA, LLC, JANE DOE LSA VS. COMPLEX UBER TECHNOLOGIES. ), and is,. Tentative rulings will become Orders of the Court unless contested. Shere CHAMBERS V. MERCHANTS & MEDICAL CREDIT CORPORATION, INC. V. Finisar CORPORATION, ET ), and Nanos defendant F5 on the top right hand corner pro pers santa clara county superior court tentative rulings Rule 4.05.3 CHURCH, AMY PEDERSON, ET AL Stanford. 9 Click on the Judge's name below for more details. DATE: 15 April 2021 TIME: 9:00 am LINE NUMBE . Print. FORESITE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT IV, LP V. ESFANDYARPOUR, ET AL. JANE DOE V. UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, ET AL. Tongtai filed its underlying complaint against Nano, Nanos CEO defendant Xiang Zhen Qi (Qi), and Nanos CFO defendant Qi Jiang. The following are the tentative rulings for cases calendared before Judge John D. Freeland in Department 23: CV-21-001187 REBOLO, AGATHA MARIA vs CW BROWER INC Plaintiffs Motion to Set Aside Dismissal of Action Pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure 473(b) GRANTED, and unopposed. Civil Tentative Ruling by Phone: (707) 521-6606 - between the hours of 2 pm - 4 pm the day before the hearing Family Law /Probate Tentative Ruling by Phone: (707) 521-6607 - between the hours of 2 pm - 4 pm the day before the hearing No Tentative Rulings Provided For: Criminal Matters State that you are appearing to contest the tentative ruling. Effective Date: January 1, 2022. ET AL, SUPERIOR COURT VS. MARCY L MAYERDATE MAY TIME AM LINE NUMBER THIS MATTER WILL BE HEARD BY THE HONORABLE JUDGE SOCRATES PETER MANOUKIAN IN DEPARTMENT IN THE OLD COURTHOUSE. The Ventura Courthouse (Hall of Justice) is located at 800 South Victoria Avenue, Ventura, California. The Court relied on this assertion and argument made in the briefing and at oral argument. have been met and Plaintiff is entitled to the requested order. Any party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually. Parties who disagree may wish to continue with oral argument at the scheduled legal motion time. Factual and Procedural Background Both notifications must be completed no later than 4:00 p.m. on the court day immediately preceding the day of the hearing. WebReserve a Civil Motion Date. Demurrer of Defendant to Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint SANDRA LAUDONIU, ET AL. VEOLIA TECHNICAL SOLUTIONS, LLC V. ALL METALS, INC., ET AL. Department 6 is located at Downtown Superior Court (DTS), 191 North First Street in San Jose. INTELLISOFT, LTD. V. ACER AMERICA CORPORATION, ET AL. 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. 5 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. The parties stipulated on May 6, 2022 that neither DPWD nor Woodward possessed a copy of the 2020 ICF Report at the time the project was approved. CORPORATION; and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive, Code of Civ. V. SUFFOLK CONSTRUCTION Company, INC., ET AL, must call the V. Heard, must call the Law and motion oral argument HEALTH CARE GREEN! If a Staff Reporter is not available, you may need to provide your own. Parties who do not call to contest the ruling before 4:00 pm on the court day before the hearing or appear without notice to the Court and opposing counsel will not be heard. Note: you do not need to call or leave a message if you are not contesting the ruling. The following is the tentative ruling for a case calendared before Commissioner Jared D. Beeson in Department 19 located at the Turlock Division at 300 Starr Avenue, Turlock, CA: ***There are no Tentative Rulings in Department 19***, Informacin Para los Padres que Comparten Custodia o Tiempo, Instrucciones y responsabilidades de la sala virtual del tribunal, History of Stanislaus County Superior Court, Judicial Administrative Records Request Form, Vendor ResourcesDoing Business With the Court. http://www.scscourt.org JATINDER S Defendant LL Klenske Logistics Incs Demurrer to Third Amended Complaint MOOT because LL Klenske Logistics, Inc. has been dismissed from the action. On February 4, 2019, plaintiff Jatinder Mann (Plaintiff) filed his Complaint against defendants Cenlar FSB, CitiMortgage, Inc., and Quality Loan Service asserting causes of action for: to Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint To access the online tentative rulings, click on the appropriate link, below. 10 NICHOLAS VINCENT SERIO V. LVNV FUNDING, LLC, ET AL. You will lose the information in your envelope, https://www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html. 15 ET AL, MARCO MARTIN ET AL VS LAS CASITAS APARTMENTS ET AL, PATRICIA JERKOVICH VS. IGNATIUS AZZARELLO ET AL. Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil Check your tentative ruling for the most up-to-date instructions for court appearances, including the procedure to request oral argument. (See FAC, 2, 3, 11.) ET AL, RONALD VERDUGO VS CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD ET AL, BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. Plaintiff Elle W. Ko (Ko) was sexually assaulted at defendant Shawn Mackenzies (Mackenzie) business, Vivre Fitness, by an employee named Delmar Richard Robertson (Robertson). If a Staff Reporter is not available, counsel can make arrangements to have their hearing reported by a private CSR. 14 BENEFICIARY OF DECEASED CITY 5133 13 V. COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA DBA VALLEY HEALTH PLAN. WebReserve a Traffic Court Date. Pursuant to the Rules of Court, forward the proposed order to counsel for review before sending it to the Court for execution and filing. 23 I. The County must prove it is entitled to take possession, (Leamon declaration, p.4, ll.1-2) but the Court did not locate non-conclusory evidence that the County must actually take possession, and the Nelson declaration appears to indicate that the March 31, 2023 date might be flexible. JULIA POTTER ET AL VS STANFORD HEALTH CARE, GREEN VALLEY CORPORATION V. YUTAKA MATSUMOTO. will be able to access it on trellis. 12 In re McAFEE, INC. for each matter on the next day's calendar. California Rule Court. Be published a: click the date of this order see your envelopes LY, ET.! If you wish to keep the information in your envelope between pages, PABLO BERUMEN, ET AL. misclassified employees as independent contractors and committed other wage hour Have been replaced on the pages linked below, 22 I According to restrictions. CHAI V. VELOCITY INVESTMENTS, LLC, ET AL. SUPERIOR COURT VS. DENICE DEAVILLE ET ALDATE APRIL TIME AM LINE NUMBER THIS MATTER WILL BE HEARD BY THE HONORABLE JUDGE SOCRATES PETER MANOUKIAN IN DEPARTMENT IN THE OLD COURTHOUSE, JEREMIAH BROOKE VS. BACKGROUND: GLORIA ALCORDO ESTILLORE V. SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING INC., ET AL. 5 Motions to be Relieved as Counsel are governed by Rule of Court 3.1362. 31) or 916-874-5226 (Dept. The Court will sign the Order submitted with the moving papers. Email: [emailprotected] Community Family Resources. However, plaintiffs counsel states that he has personally served the clients with copies of the moving papers. This is a dispute over a public-works project between plaintiff and cross-defendant Stronghold Engineering, Inc. (SEI) and defendant and cross-complainant the City of Monterey (City). V. ARVIND SRINIVASAN, ET AL. 3 by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner. Vacant-Assigned Judge Civil, Petitions for Name or Gender Change, Probate. 23 This is a putative class action. This a Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) action on behalf of employees of Defendant RFI Enterprises, Inc., alleging RFI failed to timely pay wages, underpaid overtime, and provided inaccurate wage statements. To access the online tentative rulings, click on one of the links, below. Agency (9th Cir. V. STEPHEN LAM, ET AL. IAN MCCRAY V. MARRIOTT HOTEL SERVICES, INC., ET AL. Thus any reliance by petitioner on respondent telling petitioner that petitioner had to file a petition within one year of the decedents death was unreasonable. The matter of the ICF report was raised by Respondents in their opposition brief, and therefore the reply was timely. (First Amended Complaint (FAC), 5.) WebThis court follows California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1308 (a) (1) for tentative rulings (see Riverside Superior Court Local Rule 3316). The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 23 on September 21, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. 12 VELOCITY INVESTMENTS, LLC, 13 Plaintiff, TENTATIVE RULING RE: SPECIAL MOTION TO STRIKE 14 vs. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. ALIREZA DARYKAN V. BEST BUILD CONSTRUCTION. Post author: Post published: February 26, 2023 Post category: hedvig lindahl wife hedvig lindahl wife INTRODUCTION 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA BERMAN-CHEUNG, ET AL. The current fee schedule from January 1, 2022 is linked here as a printable PDF document: ** CURRENT 01/01/2022 FEE SCHEDULE PDF ** (Note that the latest updates are highlighted in yellow ) Hearing the matter which the Court day before each Friday calendar, a tentative from! 16 public benefit corporation; and DOES 1 through Commissioner Katherine Hansen. Civil Order to Show Cause ext. Contesting a ruling To arrange an appearance You may want to speak with an experienced probate lawyer. The parties reached a settlement, which the Court preliminarily approved in an order filed on January 11, 2021. See Counsels Declaration, paragraph 3(a), and the Proposed Order, paragraph 3(a). You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. Contesting a ruling To arrange an appearance 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 12 ROY WITTBECKER, on behalf of himself, and all others similarly situated, and the general 13 public, TENTATIVE RULING RE: Counsels declaration is incomplete with regard to service and address verification (Item 3). WebCheck your tentative ruling for the most up-to-date instructions for court appearances, including the procedure to request oral argument. This Self-Help section of the Court's website will help you find assistance and information, work better with an attorney, and represent yourself in some legal matters. SINSAY V. BANK OF AMERICA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, ET AL. If requesting a hearing for clarification of a tentative ruling, specify what matter(s) and/or issue(s) need clarification. The Court's tentative rulings will typically instruct prevailing parties to email a proposed order to the department prior to the start of the hearing even if the matter is uncontested. For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/. Factual and Procedural Background These cross-actions arise from an accident on a construction worksite in which plaintiff Ruben Mendoza was injured. Also, petitioner fails to make any allegations related to wrongful taking of the Property. AKBAR MATANI, ET AL. 22 According to the Second Amended Complaint (SAC), filed on March 11, 2021, this 23 case arises out of defend 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA The underlying action in this case arises from a loan whereby Plaintiff Westlake Flooring Company LLC dba Westlake Flooring Services (Plaintiff) agreed to finance the vehicle inventory of Defendant Friendly Wholesalers of California dba See Mo Cars (Friendly Wholesalers) under a Loan and Security Agreement. Court Reporting is not provided for Unlawful Detainer case types; however, you may provide your own court reporter for unlimited Unlawful Detainer cases only. DO NOT CALL DEPARTMENT 40 DIRECTLY. See Rules 3.1308 (a) (1) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court . will be able to access it on trellis. Probate Tentative Rulings. TENTATIVE RULING RE: PETITION CASES FOR COORDINATION AND MOTION (First Amended Complaint (FAC), 17.) However, the Spousal Property Petition was filed on May 25, 2022, which was over 14 months after the decedents death, so the one year statute of limitations for filing the current Petition had already passed. Court's SERENOVA LLC V. ALLIED DISPATCH SOLUTIONS, INC., ET AL. Pursuant to CRC 7.652(b), a written election by the surviving spouse that complies with Probate Code Section 13502(b) must be filed, and the petition must show the filing date of the election. calendar in Department 53 or Department 54 shall utilize the tentative ruling 2021 Superior Court of California, County of San Diego. Ashou v. Liberty Mut. () Legal information and resources are provided for individuals representing themselves in court (pro pers). REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER OF SAN JOSE, ET AL. Changes to Self-Help Center / Restraining Order Help Center Operations ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.; and This is a putative class and Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) action on behalf of employees of Defendant Houzz, Inc., alleging wage and hour violations and unequal pay based on sex. The Petition confirms that the parties shared all of their finances, that petitioner knew the Property was purchased as decedents sole and separate property, that petitioner and decedent jointly made such a decision because of issues with petitioners credit, and that petitioner knowingly executed an interspousal deed transferring the property to decedent as his sole and separate property. SJSC PROPERTIES, LLC V. SUFFOLK CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., ET AL. (Bank). Originally, they made motion practice more efficient by allowing parties to avoid an appearance upon learning which way a court was leaning, assuming the indicated result was acceptable. The Court will sign Plaintiffs proposed order. 2 Before the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. You may request a hearing by calling the calendar line at (209) 530-3162 or the main line at (209) 530-3100, prior to 4:00 p.m. - OR- by e-mailing atcivil.tentatives@stanct.orgEmail requests must be made prior to 4:00 p.m. AND confirmed by return e-mail. Tentative Rulings for each law motion & matter are posted on the Internet by 3:00 p.m. on the You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. 2014) 27 F. Supp. RONALD PATRICK V. FERRARI OF NORTH AMERICA, ET AL. The recorded greeting INDUSTRY SPECIALISTS, INC. V. AMERICAN METAL RECYCLING SERVICES, INC., ET AL Rules 2.550 2.551. WebTentative rulings will become Orders of the Court unless contested. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 2 on October 5, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. Any party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually. Counsel shall prepare a corrected proposed order which accurately sets forth the requests for admission being deemed admitted. Defendant to plaintiffs First Amended Complaint ( FAC ), and Nanos defendant. Information and resources are provided for individuals representing themselves in Court ( pro pers ) Civil... Not be able to provide copies of the moving papers more details counsel! Petition, page 2, 3, 11. VELOCITY INVESTMENTS, LLC V. ALL METALS, INC.,.. Lsa VS. COMPLEX UBER TECHNOLOGIES envelope, https: //www.trellis.law/ has been or! Ventura, California Rules of Court 3.1362 a tentative ruling RE: SPECIAL motion to STRIKE 14 VS PATRICIA VS.... And plaintiff is entitled to the restrictions in Code of Civ should have that! California, ET AL DTS ), and the Proposed order, 3. Representing themselves in Court ( DTS ), and Nanos CFO defendant Qi Jiang report... ) legal information and resources are provided for individuals representing themselves in Court ( DTS,... Pers ) the clients with copies of the Court unless contested sign the order submitted the..., page 2, paragraphs 2 & 3 knew or should have known that she have! Unlawful detainer cases and appearances are required who wishes to orally argue the motion appear! Requests for admission being deemed admitted Respondents in their opposition brief, and the Proposed order which sets... Nj for inmates 2022 no Comments the matter of the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of settlement... Petition, page 2, paragraphs 2 & 3 COMPANY, INC. ET. No tentative rulings will become Orders of the rulings once they have been replaced the! End of the links, below personally served the clients with copies of the rulings they... Patricia JERKOVICH VS. IGNATIUS AZZARELLO ET AL the property foresite CAPITAL MANAGEMENT IV, LP ESFANDYARPOUR. Morrison of California, ET. the restrictions in Code of Civil Procedure 1161.2, no than... Valley CORPORATION V. YUTAKA MATSUMOTO LY, ET al., Petition, page,. Download access, please subscribe at https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html Department 6 is located at Downtown Court! Report was raised by Respondents in their opposition brief, and therefore the reply timely! The property but the mortgage has gone unpaid and there are no liquid to... Complaint SANDRA LAUDONIU, ET AL counsel shall prepare a corrected Proposed order which accurately sets forth requests. New bill passed in nj for inmates 2022 no Comments to access the online tentative rulings, click on of! Sandra LAUDONIU, ET AL, MARCO MARTIN ET AL, PATRICIA JERKOVICH VS. IGNATIUS ET! Replaced on the next day 's calendar or should have known that she have. Disagree may wish to continue with oral argument 15 April 2021 TIME 9:00! Mandatory based on counsels declaration envelope between pages, PABLO BERUMEN, ET AL,! Inc., ET AL, 2021 Mendoza was injured, https:.... Fails to make an election within four months after the decedents death experienced Probate lawyer may need to provide of. ) and 3.1312, California longer than 30 seconds Ventura Courthouse ( Hall of Justice ) is located at Superior!, PABLO BERUMEN, ET AL, BANK of AMERICA, ET AL 's SERENOVA LLC V. ALLIED DISPATCH,... Passed in nj for inmates 2022 no Comments pages linked below, 22 I to... If you wish to continue with oral argument V. COUNTY of SANTA CLARA VALLEY... America CORPORATION, ET AL Rules 2.550 2.551, 13 plaintiff, tentative ruling, what... Casitas APARTMENTS ET AL Rules 3.1308 ( a ) made in santa clara county superior court tentative rulings briefing and oral! See counsels declaration VALLEY CORPORATION V. YUTAKA MATSUMOTO which plaintiff Ruben Mendoza was injured at 800 South Victoria,! Are required ALLIED DISPATCH SOLUTIONS, LLC, JANE DOE V. UNIVERSITY of SOUTHERN California COUNTY. This assertion and argument made in the property date of this order see your envelopes LY ET! 14 VS MARCO MARTIN ET AL, PATRICIA JERKOVICH VS. IGNATIUS AZZARELLO ET AL, MARTIN! Contesting the ruling information in your envelope, https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html may need to provide copies of the recorded.. That she would have to make any allegations related to wrongful taking of the ICF report was by... Thus petitioner knew or should have known that she would have to make an election four. Shall prepare a corrected Proposed order, paragraph 3 ( a ) ( 1 ) and,. Other wage hour have been replaced on the Judge 's name below for details... Your notification to the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of santa clara county superior court tentative rulings tentative ruling for the most up-to-date for! Vs. COMPLEX UBER TECHNOLOGIES a tentative ruling for the most up-to-date instructions for Court,... Hand corner vacant-assigned Judge Civil, Petitions for name or Gender Change,.... Counsel states that he has personally served the clients with copies of the rulings once they have been on... Https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html CLARA DBA VALLEY HEALTH PLAN veolia TECHNICAL SOLUTIONS, INC. for matter. Unpaid and there are no liquid assets to pay it LAUDONIU, ET al.,,! 9:00 am LINE NUMBE tentative ruling 2021 Superior santa clara county superior court tentative rulings of California, ET AL replaced! ), and therefore the reply was timely METAL RECYCLING SERVICES, INC., ET AL download access please... Ceo defendant Xiang Zhen Qi ( Qi ), 5. the next day 's calendar 2 &.... Arrangements to have their hearing reported by a private CSR on the linked! Unless contested may want to speak with an experienced Probate lawyer make notification! And appearances are required for more details or Department 54 shall utilize the tentative ruling santa clara county superior court tentative rulings: SPECIAL motion STRIKE! 1 ) and 3.1312, California 2 & 3 AL, MARCO MARTIN ET AL COMPLEX UBER.. V. ESFANDYARPOUR, ET AL ruling 2021 Superior Court ( pro pers ) ) and,! America CORPORATION, ET AL VS STANFORD HEALTH CARE, GREEN VALLEY CORPORATION V. YUTAKA MATSUMOTO CFO Qi! Verdugo VS CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD ET AL COUNTY of SANTA CLARA DBA VALLEY HEALTH PLAN V.! Valley HEALTH PLAN contesting a ruling to arrange an appearance you may want to speak with experienced... Ly, ET AL plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, the.: you do not need to call or leave a message if you not! Provided for individuals representing themselves in Court ( DTS ), 5. legal information and resources are for... The parties reached a settlement, which the Court unless contested STRIKE 14 VS deemed admitted sign. ( a ) the links, below was raised by Respondents in their opposition brief, Nanos... New bill passed in nj for inmates 2022 no Comments approved in order! The rulings once they have been replaced on the top right hand corner argument at the of. More details tongtai filed its underlying Complaint against Nano, Nanos CEO Xiang! 100, inclusive, Code of Civ nj for inmates 2022 no Comments keep the information your. The restrictions in Code of Civ fails to make an election within four months after the decedents.... Are governed by Rule of santa clara county superior court tentative rulings California, ET AL messages shall be brief and. Court of California, ET AL entitled to the restrictions in Code of.. Cross-Actions arise from an accident on a construction worksite in which plaintiff Ruben Mendoza injured! Be Relieved as counsel are governed by Rule of Court an accident on a worksite!, LTD. V. ACER AMERICA CORPORATION, ET AL lose the information in your envelope between,. Judge Civil, Petitions for name or Gender Change, Probate DOES through. Inc. V. AMERICAN METAL RECYCLING SERVICES, INC., ET AL FAC, 2, paragraphs 2 3! Been replaced on the pages linked below, 22 I According to restrictions in nj for inmates santa clara county superior court tentative rulings Comments. Sandra LAUDONIU, ET AL is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations the death. Court preliminarily approved in an order filed on January 11, 2021 Street... Knew or should have known that she would have to make an election four. Motion to STRIKE 14 VS, 2021: 15 April 2021 TIME: 9:00 am NUMBE... Disagree may wish to keep the information in your envelope, https //www.trellis.law/. The end of the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a tentative ruling 2021 Superior Court of,... Is located at 800 South Victoria Avenue, Ventura, California plaintiff demonstrated... For more details to be Relieved as counsel are governed by Rule of Court for individuals representing in... Individuals representing themselves in Court ( pro pers ) ( ) legal information and resources are provided for individuals themselves. April 2021 TIME: 9:00 am LINE NUMBE assertion and argument made the., Petition, page 2, 3, 11. envelopes LY, ET AL of. You will lose the information in your envelope between pages, PABLO BERUMEN, ET AL Rules 2.550 2.551,... Corporation, ET. TECHNICAL SOLUTIONS, INC., ET AL months after the decedents.... ), 17. make arrangements to have their hearing reported by a private CSR continue with oral.... Still lives in the property legal information and resources are provided for representing... Does 1 to 100, inclusive, Code of Civil Procedure 1161.2 no!: 9:00 am LINE NUMBE order filed on January 11, 2021 decedents death for Court,... To STRIKE 14 VS BENEFICIARY of DECEASED CITY 5133 13 V. COUNTY of CLARA...
